|
| |
|
|
| |
Back
to articles |
|
|
|
|
| |
Blur Building |
|
| |
The Architecture of Nothing |
|
| |
Unpublished, written for TENbyTEN |
|
|
|
|
| |
When approached to design an exhibition pavilion
for Expo
2002 at the tip of Lake Neuchâtel in Switzerland,
the New York-based multidisciplinary studio Diller + Scofidio
(now Diller Scofidio + Renfro) conceptualized a most unlikely
solution: making nothing. According to an early napkin sketch,
their contribution would be “formless, massless, colorless,
weightless, odorless, scaleless, featureless, meaningless.”
Early renderings envisioned a cloudlike mass suspended above
the lake surface, though the architects preferred the term
Blur as a moniker for the project, “as an alternative
to the new orthodoxy of high definition,” according
to Elizabeth Diller.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
Early rendering |
|
|
|
|
| |
But of course a physical construction cannot
literally be made of nothing, so the duo proposed over 20,000
high-pressure fog nozzles attached to a lightweight tensegrity
structure (developed by R.
Buckminster Fuller in the 1950s and loosely defined as
a balance of compression and tension members) to create an
enveloping mist. The football-field sized structure hovered
75’ above the water’s surface on four columns
sitting on piles sunk deep beneath the water. Visitors reached
the Blur Building via a 400’ long walkway after donning
raincoats on shore. Once “inside” and shrouded
in the fine, foggy mist they could continue upstairs to the
Angel Bar, a break in the cloud serving a sampling of various
spring, artesian, mineral, sparkling, and other bottled waters
from around the world. In effect, one could take in the fabric
of the building.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
Night view from shore |
|
|
|
|
| |
The path to the realization of the Blur Building
was anything but easy, full of crisis management among the
various team members, underhanded contractors, and shady sponsors,
all affecting the project’s scope and potential for
success. The biggest disappointment for the architects was
the omission of an integrated media installation: smart raincoats
- “braincoats” – with embedded computer
technology would respond to each other with glowing, colored
lights, acting as a wayfinding aid in the fog and as a means
of interacting with the expansive deck. As built, only a small
strip of LED
lights were mounted at about eye level on structural columns
for safety. Although the braincoats weren’t part of
the five-month Expo run, Elizabeth Diller and Ricardo Scofidio’s
contribution was a resounding success, visited by over one
million people. The Swiss press called it “a crazy,
idiosyncratic thing! How deliciously without purpose!”
Images of the cloud appeared on everything from sugar packets
and chocolate bars to phone cards and lottery tickets, making
it the most recognizable image of the Expo, an irony not lost
on the architects.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
Inside the "cloud" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The theoretically-grounded Elizabeth Diller and
Ricardo Scofidio embrace the open-ended interpretations made
possible with their pavilion, though their favorite subject
seems to be the weather. “When we speak about the weather,
it is assumed that we are talking about nothing,” according
to Diller, “but is not the weather, in fact, a potent
topic of cultural exchange, a bond that cuts through social
distinction and economic class, superseding geopolitical border?”
Far from nothing, what they designed and built is something
thought-provoking that questions the physical and theoretical
limits of architecture. More importantly Blur questions the
difference between architecture and the environment; at Lake
Neuchâtel Diller + Scofidio have managed to create both.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
::
Text © John Hill |
|
|
|
|
|
|