|
| |
|
|
| |
Back
to articles |
|
|
|
|
| |
Recycling, Renewal, and Radicchio |
|
| |
Ken Dunn and Mobile City Farmstead |
|
| |
Published in TENbyTEN's
"Romance" issue |
|
|
|
|
| |
Recently Chicago has experienced a surge of architectural
hipness, after years of wallowing in mediocrity. International
superstars Frank Gehry and Rem Koolhaas have left their mark
at Millennium
Park and the Illinois
Institute of Technology, respectively. Local bad-boy Helmut
Jahn has returned from European exile to build an
elegant dormitory, also at IIT. But hipper than Gehry, Koolhaas,
and Jahn bundled together is sustainability, loosely defined
as design that works with the natural environment, considers
future generations, and addresses economic, social, and environmental
concerns in a sensitive manner.
While this doesn’t sound very exciting, architects
have latched onto the cause, creating some of the most beautiful
architecture in recent years, including Norman Foster’s
Commerzbank
and Gherkin
towers in Europe, Renzo Piano’s Jean-Marie
Tjibaou Cultural Center in Asia, and Behnisch, Behnisch
& Partner’s Genzyme
Center in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Likewise, Chicago’s
Mayor, Richard M. Daley, has latched on to sustainability,
assuredly stating that the Midwestern city will be the greenest
in the United States. Littering sidewalks and parkways with
trees, putting green roofs on Loop high-rises, creating the
Chicago Center for Green Technology, and recently holding
an international design competition for the Ford
Calumet Environmental Center, the Boss is realizing his
goal one piece at a time.
One important piece in this picture—though not affiliated
with the City of Chicago—is Resource
Center, a not-for-profit environmental organization headed
by Ken Dunn. With recycling, composting, and educational programs,
Dunn’s scope appears to extend beyond the Mayor’s
mission, particularly in his quest to change the way we grow
and consume our food. “We’re trying to be sustainable
in other ways,” Dunn says, “beyond merely organic
means.” Through architecture he’s found a way
to further his ambitious agenda, but first some words on one
of the Center’s programs.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
Rendered view of Farmstead looking southwest |
|
|
|
|
| |
Resource Center’s City
Farm fills a vacant lot near the corner of Division and
Clybourn, between Cabrini-Green
public housing to the west, and the Old Town and Gold Coast
neighborhoods to the east. On the large lot, Dunn harvests
some of the most delicious vegetables you’ll ever eat,
including beets, carrots, potatoes, lettuce, and tomatoes,
selling them to high-end restaurants like Frontera
Grill, North
Pond, and the Ritz-Carlton
Dining Room. Through this effort, he grows the produce
organically and sells it for local consumption, a rarity in
this age of large-scale agri-business and packaged foods.
Dunn explains, “We want to get everybody used to food
grown in the city, creating a sustainable culture but also
a sustainable economy, by employing the unemployable and possibly
homeless people.”
To physically achieve this program, Dunn leases vacant lots
around the city (four separate City Farms at the time of writing,
but with over 80,000 vacant lots in Chicago, there’s
no shortage for his needs), lays down a protective clay barrier
if required, brings in fresh soil and compost from his other
sites and programs, and farms the land until it’s sold
for redevelopment. This transient existence helps to beautify
the vacant patches around the city, while at the same time
being a viable use for the land and creating jobs for the
local communities.
Architecture came into play in early 2003, when four employees
of local architecture firms DeStefano
+ Partners and Valerio
DeWalt Train—Matthew Kuhl, Karin Lucas, Dan Rappel,
Amy Struckmeyer, and Shwetha Subramanian—attended a
one-day urban gardening workshop, or charette, at the Chicago
Center for Green Technology. There they met Ken Dunn and
learned about his ambitious programs. “I was struck
by the clarity and simplicity of his ideas,” says Kuhl.
“What’s exciting about Ken’s program is
that he plants his farm where it’s least expected, in
some of the most derelict spaces in the city,” Lucas
adds. “He moves in topsoil and plants and transforms
vacant city lots nearly overnight.”
Months later, when the First Annual Chicago Sustainable Design
Challenge was organized by the Foresight
Design Initiative (a local chapter of the Global
o2 Network), they reunited with Dunn to create the Mobile
City Farmstead. “We discussed a number of potential
ideas but Ken’s farm seemed the most promising,”
explains Rappel, adding that “we were a bit nervous
Ken wouldn’t like our design, but he ended up loving
it.” The entry went on to win the Design Challenge’s
Award for Design Excellence. |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
Rendered view of Farmstead porch and workspace |
|
|
|
|
| |
The Mobile City Farmstead will be the focus of
City Farm’s site at Division and Clybourn, creating an
identity for Dunn’s program and a physical anchor for
the site. It will provide a gathering area, workspace, restroom,
and small produce stand. The Farmstead will also provide a place
from which to conduct classes, tours, and gatherings, such as
the annual Slow
Food Urban Harvest held in the autumn. Beyond the Division
and Clybourn site, the Farmstead will become a prototypical
design that can be transported easily to other sites across
the city. Ideally, multiple ones will sprout up throughout Chicago.
So where’s the hipness? It lies in the architectural
components and their relationship to City Farm’s overreaching
ideas. Most apparent are two reused shipping containers. One
contains office space, while the other provides storage space
and acts as the produce stand. Each is emblazoned with super-graphics,
images of tomatoes enlarged greater than human size. New openings
for access and the produce stand’s retail window are
made via welding the container. These relatively cheap ($1,500
a piece) containers give the project its primary identity,
an industrial aesthetic that fits at home in most city sites.
“Using shipping containers was really a no-brainer,”
says Rappel, “due to them being transportable, weatherproof,
and relatively cheap.” By reusing them, the architects
are also relating to one of Dunn’s other programs, recycling.
The architects found inspiration in the work of LOT-EK,
a New York-based architecture studio that investigates the
reuse of outdated industrial objects for contemporary uses,
such as a loft where residents sleep in a refashioned petroleum
trailer tank. With the shipping containers, the architects
found a functional object that also symbolizes City Farm’s
transient nature, similarly evident in Australian architect
Sean Godsell’s Future
Shack, his prototypical housing for disaster victims that
uses shipping containers as temporary homes. Another reference
is the late Samuel Mockbee’s Rural
Studio in Alabama, where his students recycled everything
from carpets to car windshields for homes and other buildings
for the rural poor. “We’re taking an object that’s
become an almost disposable commodity,” explains Kuhl.
It appears that the Farmstead architects are using industrial
components as a way to salvage the excesses of globalization,
but also as creative inspiration and a way to brand City Farm
in the urban environment.
At Division and Clybourn, the two shipping containers start
to define the area of the Farmstead, further delineated by
vine-covered chain-link fencing and straw bales (although
used in the original competition design, at the time of writing
the architects were considering bundling non-combustible paper
used by Blue Man Group or breaking down and reusing wood palettes,
objects that are as ubiquitous as shipping containers). Additionally,
a canvas covering provides shade while funneling rainwater
towards a collecting basin, where the water can then be used
for washing vegetables at the outdoor work area.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
Rendered view of Farmstead from City Farm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
What all these components (shipping containers,
chain-link fencing, bales, canvas) have in common is their thrift,
as well as being degradable, salvageable, and transportable. If
all goes to plan, the Division and Clybourn site will be only
the first of many sites where the Farmstead will find a home.
Sized to the minimum requirements for a viable City Farm (approximately
half an acre), the Farmstead is designed to be relocated quickly,
particularly when the soon-to-be neighboring SRO (developed by
Lakefront
Supportive Housing and designed by Helmut
Jahn) goes ahead with its Phase 2 plans at the corner site.
Recently visiting the site with the architects and Dunn, I learned
that the first phase of the SRO taking place of the current City
Farm, which eventually relocates to Ohio and Larabee, will impact
the Farmstead’s initial site plan, but that didn’t
faze either party. “We originally designed the Farmstead
to be next to the alley, for vehicle access and loading,”
recounts Struckmeyer. “By moving the Farmstead south and
rotating it, we addressed concerns of access during construction
next door,” she continues, “I think it will work just
as well in its new location, and having it right on Clybourn may
even give the whole project more prominence.” Change is
an integral component of the architectural process, the design,
and City Farm’s existence, making this maneuver indicative
of the Farmstead design’s malleability that will help make
it suitable on other sites around the city.
While the Farmstead’s design, and its sustainable components,
may make it unintentionally hip, it also embodies romantic notions,
owing to Dunn’s City Farm and its methods and goals. City
Farm returns us to an era when people ate locally what was grown
locally. Aiming for the same scenario today gives us fresher,
organic foods, but also has the effect of beautifying our surroundings
while serving greater cultural and economic needs and promoting
a climate of sustainability in Chicago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
Text © John Hill |
|
|
|
|
|
|